House party
The Blogfather reminded us all recently about the importance of occasionally testing yourself at higher limits. Last night, after busting out of a Group tournament on Stars, I decided to take my shot. Nothing extraordinary. I had a little profit in Titan to play with and decided to sit at a $1/2 6-max no-limit table for the first time.
I've played some $1/2 NL live with The Group. While I have fared okay at times, there also were occasions when I felt overmatched. I couldn't adjust to people calling $8 and $10 preflop raises with ace-rag and other odd holdings. I couldn't adjust to the big post-flop bets. I couldn't adjust period. Understand: Many of the people in The Group can play. But there are others who have some skills and are recklessly aggressive to boot. I've stayed away from $1/2 since my last expensive donk session. The friendlier confines of the .25/.50 "kiddie" game have been more my speed.
But online is a different situation. And I viewed the $100 I was taking to Titan's $1/2 table as mad money. I don't think much of the site (no stored hand histories, awful tournament structures), so I figured that if I lost my buy-in and whatever else I had behind it would be no big deal. I needed to take a shot and last night felt like the right time and place.
I'm not sure how much I learned other than the fact there are some bad poker players on Titan. We're talking .10/.25 Party Poker bad. I had seen some horrendous play at lower limits on Titan, but I expected $1/2 to be much tougher. I cashed out with $250 during a 30-minute session. I got all my money in with A-Q after hitting an ace on the flop and a queen on the turn and got doubled up by ... pocket 8s. Alrighty then. Not long after, I took a big chunk off someone with a flopped set of 9s vs. A-K. He got his ace on the flop and fell hopelessly in love with TPTK.
After busting out of the Wil Wheaton tournament tonight I ignored conventional poker wisdom about short sessions and decided to sit at a $1/2 table for the 15 minutes that stood betwen me and a $5 rebuy tournament. I cashed out $135 in profits just as the tournament started. Playing mostly four- and five-handed, I didn't see too much talent at that table, either. Get-the-nuts-and-wait-for-someone-to-inevitably-pay-you-off poker continues to be a worthwhile strategy.
I realize that 45 minutes is a meaningless sample of what the actual level of play might be. Nor, as they say in the fine print, are these two sessions any indication of future performance. I can see me kissing those newfound winnings good-bye in a hurry when the donks start sucking out instead of paying. Or when the real players show up.
While a wise gambler once admonished me to never think of winnings as the house's money, my Titan bankroll feels a little bit like that right now. And, I figure, sitting at a table with the house's money is preferable to playing with scared money, no matter who it belongs to.
I've played some $1/2 NL live with The Group. While I have fared okay at times, there also were occasions when I felt overmatched. I couldn't adjust to people calling $8 and $10 preflop raises with ace-rag and other odd holdings. I couldn't adjust to the big post-flop bets. I couldn't adjust period. Understand: Many of the people in The Group can play. But there are others who have some skills and are recklessly aggressive to boot. I've stayed away from $1/2 since my last expensive donk session. The friendlier confines of the .25/.50 "kiddie" game have been more my speed.
But online is a different situation. And I viewed the $100 I was taking to Titan's $1/2 table as mad money. I don't think much of the site (no stored hand histories, awful tournament structures), so I figured that if I lost my buy-in and whatever else I had behind it would be no big deal. I needed to take a shot and last night felt like the right time and place.
I'm not sure how much I learned other than the fact there are some bad poker players on Titan. We're talking .10/.25 Party Poker bad. I had seen some horrendous play at lower limits on Titan, but I expected $1/2 to be much tougher. I cashed out with $250 during a 30-minute session. I got all my money in with A-Q after hitting an ace on the flop and a queen on the turn and got doubled up by ... pocket 8s. Alrighty then. Not long after, I took a big chunk off someone with a flopped set of 9s vs. A-K. He got his ace on the flop and fell hopelessly in love with TPTK.
After busting out of the Wil Wheaton tournament tonight I ignored conventional poker wisdom about short sessions and decided to sit at a $1/2 table for the 15 minutes that stood betwen me and a $5 rebuy tournament. I cashed out $135 in profits just as the tournament started. Playing mostly four- and five-handed, I didn't see too much talent at that table, either. Get-the-nuts-and-wait-for-someone-to-inevitably-pay-you-off poker continues to be a worthwhile strategy.
I realize that 45 minutes is a meaningless sample of what the actual level of play might be. Nor, as they say in the fine print, are these two sessions any indication of future performance. I can see me kissing those newfound winnings good-bye in a hurry when the donks start sucking out instead of paying. Or when the real players show up.
While a wise gambler once admonished me to never think of winnings as the house's money, my Titan bankroll feels a little bit like that right now. And, I figure, sitting at a table with the house's money is preferable to playing with scared money, no matter who it belongs to.
2 Comments:
Nice work at the $1-$2 6 max nl.Table selection is probably the key.Too many good players show up or if there's not at least one blatant donkey its time to move...
soon my friend, all your gold will be mine
Post a Comment
<< Home